Anuarul societatii prahovene de antropologie generala. Yearbook of Prahova Country Society for General Anthropology – In honorem magistri Gheorghita Geana Editite bilingva: romana-engleza Ati reusit o performanta rara, aceea de a scrie intr-o revista „de stat” [Viata Romaneasca, 1, 1986] despre Traditie si libertate in spiritualitatea ortodoxa .
Si ati scris intr-un chip care dezvaluie sufletul dvs. ca pe o pestera de sihastru.
– Antonie Plantadeala, Mitropolitul Ardealului Am rasfoit acest articol / jurnalul tau [„Boabe de zabava”, in Anuarul societatii prahovene de antropologie generala , 3, 2017] plin de verva si de pasaje gustoase (si despre asociatia noastra EASA [European Association of Social Anthropologists])… Intre timp, doresc sa va felicit, pe tine si pe studentii tai, pentru aceasta initiativa editoriala prahoveana, care dovedeste vitalitatea antropologiei romanesti de azi [orig.
in rom.] – Filippo Zerilli, Universita di Cagliari I thought that in your article [„Ethnicity and globalisation. Outline of a complementarist conceptualisation”, in Social Anthropology (EASA journal, vol.
5, part 2, 1997)] you were absolutely correct to warn against approaching complicated social issues with dichotomous categories (e.g. globalization / locality, or Gemeinschaft / Gesellschaft, etc., etc.).
It was an important insight that I learned early on from my teacher and very good friend, Professor Edward Shils. Would that more scholars appreciated your point!
– Steven Grosby, Clemson University, South Carolina I met Gheorghita Geana on a couple of occasions and was very impressed by him. I also read his autobiographical chapter in the Mateoc / Ruegg collection [ Recalling Fieldwork , LIT Verlag, 2020].
It is a fascinating contrast to the majority of contributions to that book, which are the work of Western anthropologists. Chris Hann – Emeritus Director, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Fellow, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge Antropologia este stiinta, constainta de sine si ratiunea genului uman .
In ansamblul cunoasterii, antropologia s-ar cuveni sa ocupe locul pe care obiectul sau de studiu il ocupa in cosmos. Acest loc nu este unul marginas, ci, dimpotriva, unul central.
Omul nu a incetat niciodata sa-si rezerve in conceptiile despre univers pozitia de centru valoric. Asadar, fata de universul existent, conditia umana se poate defini drept antropocentrism axiologic .
Iar aceasta conditie se intrainiceste pe masura ce cunoasterea omului de catre sine devine din ce in ce mai aprofundata. – Gheorghita Geana